ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF LAYER THICKNESS ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF PLA PRINTED PRODUCTS USING FDM TECHNOLOGY FOR THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM), commonly known as 3D printing, uses various methods, including Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). This study focuses on the surface roughness performance of 3D-printed propellers using FDM with PLA material. This study aims to determine the optimal layer thickness to achieve the best surface quality in additive manufacturing. Surface roughness was measured using the arithmetic mean (Ra) and measured at the propeller's centre, base, and endpoints with an Olympus laser scanning microscope. Experiments were conducted with layer thicknesses of 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, and 0.3 mm, while keeping other printing parameters constant, namely printing temperature at 210°C, printing speed at 50%, nozzle diameter at 0.4 mm, bed temperature at 70°C, infill pattern lines, infill density at 100%, edge support type, wall thickness at 0.8 mm, and eSUN material diameter at 1.75 mm. The results show that a layer thickness of 0.1 mm produces the highest surface quality and dimensional accuracy at all tested points on the propeller, but affects the printing time. These results underline the important role of layer thickness in optimizing the surface finish and structural integrity of 3D printed components in additive manufacturing processes
Downloads
References
R. Y. Zhong, X. Xu, E. Klotz, and S. T. Newman, “Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review,” Engineering, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 616–630, 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015.
N. Syamsir, R. Nur, and A. Salam, “Analyzing and modelling gripper arm using shape optimization of fusion 360 and 3D printing of polylactic acid,” AIP Conf Proc, vol. 2543, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1063/12.0010284.
Y. Lu, “Cyber physical system (CPS)-based industry 4.0: A survey,” Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, vol. 2, no. 3, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1142/S2424862217500142.
P. Holzmann, R. J. Breitenecker, A. A. Soomro, and E. J. Schwarz, “User entrepreneur business models in 3D printing,” 2017, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-12-2015-0115.
S. Deswal, R. Narang, and D. Chhabra, “Modeling and parametric optimization of FDM 3D printing process using hybrid techniques for enhancing dimensional preciseness,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1197–1214, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12008-019-00536-z.
P. Yadav, A. Sahai, and R. S. Sharma, “Strength and Surface Characteristics of FDM-Based 3D Printed PLA Parts for Multiple Infill Design Patterns,” Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 197–207, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40032-020-00625-z.
J. Jiang, J. Lou, and G. Hu, “Effect of support on printed properties in fused deposition modelling processes,” Virtual Phys Prototyp, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 308–315, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/17452759.2019.1568835.
B. Kang, J. Hyeon, and H. So, “Facile microfabrication of 3-dimensional (3D) hydrophobic polymer surfaces using 3D printing technology,” Appl Surf Sci, vol. 499, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143733.
X. Wang, M. Jiang, Z. Zhou, J. Gou, and D. Hui, “3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective,” Feb. 01, 2017, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034.
N. Shahrubudin, T. C. Lee, and R. Ramlan, “An overview on 3D printing technology: Technological, materials, and applications,” in Procedia Manufacturing, Elsevier B.V., 2019, pp. 1286–1296. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089.
R. Melnikova, A. Ehrmann, and K. Finsterbusch, “3D printing of textile-based structures by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) with different polymer materials,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Physics Publishing, 2014. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/62/1/012018.
S. Wickramasinghe, T. Do, and P. Tran, “FDM-Based 3D printing of polymer and associated composite: A review on mechanical properties, defects and treatments,” Jul. 01, 2020, MDPI AG. doi: 10.3390/polym12071529.
R. Mendricky and D. Fris, “Analysis of the accuracy and the surface roughness of fdm/fff technology and optimisation of process parameters,” Tehnicki Vjesnik, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1166–1173, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.17559/TV-20190320142210.
J. B. Soares, J. Finamor, F. P. Silva, L. Roldo, and L. H. Cândido, “Analysis of the influence of polylactic acid (PLA) colour on FDM 3D printing temperature and part finishing,” Rapid Prototyp J, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1305–1316, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1108/RPJ-09-2017-0177.
N. Hill and M. Haghi, “Deposition direction-dependent failure criteria for fused deposition modeling polycarbonate,” Rapid Prototyp J, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 221–227, 2014, doi: 10.1108/RPJ-04-2013-0039.
M. S. Alsoufi and A. E. Elsayed, “Surface Roughness Quality and Dimensional Accuracy—A Comprehensive Analysis of 100% Infill Printed Parts Fabricated by a Personal/Desktop Cost-Effective FDM 3D Printer,” Materials Sciences and Applications, vol. 09, no. 01, pp. 11–40, 2018, doi: 10.4236/msa.2018.91002.
T. J. Suteja and A. Soesanti, “Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Product for Various Infill Design Parameters: A Review,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Institute of Physics Publishing, Jul. 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1569/4/042010.
R. Narang and D. Chhabra, “Analysis of Process Parameters of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Technique Design and analysis of Piezoelectric energy harvesting using fluid flow dynamics View project Patient specific care View project,” International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science & Communication Engineering , vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 41–48, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325390838
A. F. Barreno-Avila, M. Monar-Naranjo, and E. M. Barreno-Avila, “Fusion deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing parameters correlation: An analysis of different polymers surface roughness,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 1173, no. 1, p. 012071, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1173/1/012071.
M. Pérez, G. Medina-Sánchez, A. García-Collado, M. Gupta, and D. Carou, “Surface quality enhancement of fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed samples based on the selection of critical printing parameters,” Materials, vol. 11, no. 8, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ma11081382.
A. Makalesi, M. Kam, H. Saruhan, and A. İpekçi, “Investigation the Effect of 3d Printer System Vibrations on Surface Roughness of the Printed Products,” Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, vol. 7, pp. 147–157, 2019.
N. R. Madhu, H. Erfani, S. Jadoun, M. Amir, Y. Thiagarajan, and N. P. S. Chauhan, “Fused deposition modelling approach using 3D printing and recycled industrial materials for a sustainable environment: a review,” Sep. 01, 2022, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-10048-y.
“Shenzhen Esun Industrial Co., Ltd. - PLA, ABS.” Accessed: Jan. 22, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://esun.en.alibaba.com/
R. K. Upadhyay, A. K. Mishra, and A. Kumar, “Mechanical Degradation of 3D Printed PLA in Simulated Marine Environment,” Surfaces and Interfaces, vol. 21, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100778.
N. V. Babu, N. Venkateshwaran, N. Rajini, S. O. Ismail, F. Mohammad, H. A. Al-Lohedan, and S. Siengchin, “Influence of slicing parameters on surface quality and mechanical properties of 3D-printed CF/PLA composites fabricated by FDM technique,” Materials Technology, 37(9), 1008-1025., vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1008–1025, 2022.S
M. S. Alsoufi and A. E. Elsayed, “How Surface Roughness Performance of Printed Parts Manufactured by Desktop FDM 3D Printer with PLA+ is Influenced by Measuring Direction,” American Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 211–222, 2017, doi: 10.12691/ajme-5-5-4.
N. Ayrilmis, “Effect of layer thickness on surface properties of 3D printed materials produced from wood flour/PLA filament,” Polym Test, vol. 71, pp. 163–166, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.009.
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurhidayanti, Lukmanul Hakim Arma, Rusdi Nur

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









